Gresky, Ten
Eyck, Lord, & McIntyre, 2005
This experiment examined the role of
multiple identities in attenuating stereotype threat. Male and
female undergraduates who varied in their level
of identification with math were asked to answer some
questions that supposedly were to be used in a new
version of the GRE math test. To induce stereotype
threat, researchers told the students that the test was
being used "because of the well-known stereotype that men
usually outperform women on math tests" (stereotype
threat for women). Before
taking the math test, some participants were asked to
create self-concept maps as an exercise involving
graphical representation. Whereas some
participants did not create a self-concept map, others
were induced to form simple maps (reflecting the
person's "most basic or fundamentally important
characteristic") or complex maps (reflecting "a complete
description" of the person). In contrast with
individuals who did not make self-concept maps or who made simple maps, women who made complex
self-concept maps were unaffected by the stereotype threat
manipulation. Women who made no
maps or simple maps performed more poorly under
stereotype threat if they were highly identified with
math, whereas performance of women not highly identified
with math did not differ across the conditions. In
addition, women who were highly identified with math
performed as well as men if they had created complex
self-maps. Performance deficits under stereotype
threat were alleviated by prompting women to think of
themselves in a multifaceted manner.Back to top | Previous
Page
|